9 ways to gauge the health of an economy
From Kim Iskyan, Editor, Stansberry Churchouse Research:
Crisis creates opportunity. But the first part of that aphorism – the “crisis” part – is what you want to avoid as an investor.
In a book published last year, The Rise and Fall of Nations: Forces of Change in the Post-Crisis World, Ruchir Sharma – head of emerging markets for global bank and funds manager Morgan Stanley’s asset management business – talks about a number of indicators to assess the health of an economy.
These aren’t “tipping into crisis” indicators… but signposts of the long-term trajectory of an economy.
These are some of the indicators that Sharma looks at…
Two things drive economic growth – population growth (whether it’s natural or through immigration), and higher productivity (that is, how much a person, business or country produces within a certain period).
If a country’s population isn’t growing, its economy will have difficulties growing. By this measure, Africa is in a great place, and parts of Asia are poised to benefit from growing populations. Japan, on the other hand, is the poster child of terrible demographics. And for much of the developed world – with the important exception (for now) of the U.S. – the demographic destiny isn’t a happy one.
2. Billionaire lists
Over the long term, Sharma says, socioeconomic inequality tends to result in political revolt. To gauge this, he looks at billionaire wealth (for example, from those lists in Forbes magazine) as a percentage of GDP; the share of billionaire wealth that’s inherited; and wealth that comes from corrupt industries. If too many people hold too much of an economy’s wealth, there will eventually be a redistribution – and the rich people won’t like it.
A more common way to look at this is using the Gini coefficient, which measures the level of income inequality within a country. By this measure, South Africa and Namibia are the most unequal economies in the world… and Finland and Romania are among the most equal.
3. Cover story curse
The mythology of cover curses – for sports stars, the price of oil, stock markets and much else – is a reflection of the mainstream lagging reality.
As soon as the hot stock, market or country hits the cover of Forbes magazine, it’s already crested – and is on its way down. (Or with the image below, it’s on its way back up.) As my former colleague Peter Churchouse says, “if it’s in the press, it’s in the price”. If you see that hot stock or market on the cover – that’s the time to sell.
In recent years, the fear of deflation – that is, prices going down – has haunted central bank policy makers around the world (Japan, again, is a trend leader). Sharma advises keeping a close watch on asset price inflation because of the tight link between asset bubbles and recession.
If asset prices – like stocks or real estate – move up too much too fast, a bust may be on its way.
You might think that the 2008-2009 global economic crisis delivered a crowbar-to-the-head message about debt: Too much debt is bad. But since then, overall levels of debt haven’t declined. Total lending is up by more than 40 percent since then.
Markets where private debt rises a lot faster than the economy as a whole are particularly worth keeping a close eye on. And in particular (see: Argentina, now) beware of markets that have borrowed a lot in hard currency, only to see the local currency depreciate to the heavens are especially dangerous.
6. The “second city” rule
If the population of the capital of a country is far bigger than the second-largest city (for example, more than three times bigger), Sharma looks for a high risk of rural rebellion.
For example: Bangkok, Thailand’s capital, has 8.3 million people. The country’s second-biggest city, Samut Prakan, has just under 400,000. And… Thailand has a long and rich history of city-vs-country divisions.
But it’s not always the case. The Philippines, for instance, has 24 million people living it its capital of Metro Manila. Its second largest city, Cebu, has 2.8 million inhabitants. Both are growing fast and have a booming middle class.
7. Domestic capital flows
If local capital leaves the country, it’s bad news. After all, who knows better than people at home whether their currency is in trouble, and whether they can earn a reasonable return that reflects the risk of holding the currency.
Foreign capital – “hot money” – is often pointed to as the cause of currency crises, but frequently it’s local money that is the first down the spillway.
I’ve seen this in a number of markets… most memorably in 1998, when Russian investors were selling everything that wasn’t nailed down to ditch the ruble. Meanwhile, foreigners were gleefully lining up to buy ruble-denominated sovereign bonds, drawn in by sky-high yields. Then the ruble collapsed and the Russian government defaulted on its debt. Local investors may have missed out on a bit of yield. But they weren’t blown up when everything went to pieces
We recently wrote about corollary to this rule: Where are rich people moving from… and to? Maybe they’re leaving their home in search of a better lifestyle… or lower taxes… or more opportunity. Whatever the reason, it’s not a good sign when a country is hemorrhaging millionaires. (Last year, China, India and Turkey saw the largest number of high net-worth individuals leaving for good.)
8. Stale leaders
Sharma shows that economic reform – for many emerging markets, a critical building block of growth – usually happens during a leader’s first term. After that, it probably won’t happen at all. Leaders lose the impetus to change, and grow content with the status quo. That’s especially true (in more corrupt countries in particular) if the status quo entails state-sponsored stealing by the head of government to enrich himself.
For example… during the first few years of his first term, Russian President Vladimir Putin was hailed as a reformist hero. He brought about big and important changes in regulations and policies regarding land, fiscal issues, the judiciary, and pensions. And then, after a few years, his interest in changing things ended, as Sharma suggests.
9. Good spending vs. bad spending
An investment bubble that results in acres of empty office buildings – which don’t produce anything or help anyone – is an example of “bad” spending. But if investors, or the government, go overboard on spending on assets that will eventually boost productivity (like technology, research or manufacturing), it will be a lot better for the long-term health of the economy.
No country is going to fail on all these measures – just like no economy is going to sail through. But they are important to keep in mind as you look at market opportunities around the world. If a country fails more measures than it passes, chances are that it’s going to face problems soon.
Crux note: As Kim writes, technology spending is a great sign for the economy… and on the cutting edge of tech today are artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation. This is not a fad. It’s a growing trend with tons of momentum behind it.
Investing bank Merrill Lynch predicts revenue in artificial intelligence-related technology to grow by roughly 6,000% between now and 2025… That’s a more than $100 billion market. This technology will reshape everything we do… And early investors could make a fortune, much like those who invested in FAANG stocks 10 years ago… or bitcoin a year ago.
To learn more about the robotics revolution – and how you can profit – click here.